Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings. We also know where WR Snowproof is made - Finland/Russian Federation.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
