In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2021 | 195/65 R15 | View |
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR Snowproof
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.