Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.073. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2 | 2- | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | ||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 2- | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,9 | 2,0 | 2,6 | 2,0 | |
| Nokian WR Snowproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |
| Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 3,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 36,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 36,1 | 28,8 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof | 32,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 33,9 | 25 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 33,5 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||