Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 7 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Michelin ALPIN 7
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Michelin ALPIN 7 has a better rating of 83% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2025 when was the Michelin ALPIN 7 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin ALPIN 7 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Michelin ALPIN 7
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin ALPIN 7 3.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 7 Very good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 7 Good2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
