Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 2.6 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
