Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost3. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Barum Polaris 5 15.154. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Snow
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 2.6 | ||||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2.4 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
