Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Falken (58%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 62% compared to 55% of the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2023 when was the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Falken EuroWinter HS02 Pro Conditionally recommended
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry lane changing
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
