• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P has a better rating of 93% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the WinterContact TS 870 P were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also have B wet ratings.

# Nokian WR Snowproof P
/67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
/93%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Continental
DimensionsR17 - R21 R16 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

4

Mutual tests

ADAC
Name Enviromental impact
Best values in test1.7
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory
2.5
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Rating: Good
2.2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,825,4
Nokian WR Snowproof P3626,2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P34,625,5
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+2+2+2+
Nokian WR Snowproof P
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Rating: Good
2+ 2+ 1-3
Show test details
Tyre Reviews
Name
Best values in test1
Nokian WR Snowproof P1
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Rating: Test winner
1
Show test details