Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has a better rating of 91% compared to 67% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2024 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the Blizzak 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Premium2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Exemplary2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Enviromental impact | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1.7 | ||||||
| Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 2.5 | ||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 Rating: Good | 2.3 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||