Segment
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D4 and Yokohama W.drive V905, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the WR D4 and the W.drive V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. We also know where WR D4 is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian WR D4
| Yokohama W.drive V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian WR D4 Upper-middle2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR D4 14.
1. Nokian WR D4 6.04
1. Nokian WR D4 Highly recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR D4 Recommended2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR D4 80%
2. Nokian WR D4 73%
2. Nokian WR D4 64%
1. Nokian WR D4 70%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 73%
1. Nokian WR D4 71%
1. Nokian WR D4 83%
1. Nokian WR D4 87%
1. Nokian WR D4 58%
1. Nokian WR D4 72%
1. Nokian WR D4 84%
1. Nokian WR D4 89%
1. Nokian WR D4 82%
These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 27,6 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 36,6 | 29,5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 35 | 27,7 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 34,7 | 28,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,7 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 3,0 | 1,5 | 1,7 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 3,0 | 1,9 |
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,7 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Nokian WR D4 | 37,3 | 26,0 | |||||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 | 39,9 | 26,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,3 | 2,1 | 1,7 | 2,0 | 2,8 | 1,5 | 1,5 |
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: - | 2,6 | 2,4 | 2,2 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: - | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,1 | 2,9 | 4,0 | 3,5 | 2,4 |
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,2 | 9,4 | 9,2 | 9,3 | 9,4 | ||
| Nokian WR D4 Rating: Recommended | 8,2 | 8,0 | 7,9 | 8,7 | 8,4 | ||
| Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 7,6 | 6,7 | 8,5 | 8,0 | 7,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||