Comparison: Nokian WR D4 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR D4 and Kumho WinterCraft WP51, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the WR D4 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 97% of Nokian WR D4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR D4 is made in Finland and WinterCraft WP51 is made in Korea.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 5 tests
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Nokian WR D4
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
