Segment
1. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR C3 vs. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Maxxis (50%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR C3 and Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the WR C3 and the Vansmart Snow WL2 were tested.
| # | Nokian WR C3
| Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R12 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Still recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet handling
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
Wet braking
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow traction
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Snow braking
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
Interior noise
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Maxxis Vansmart Snow WL2 Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
