Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR C3 and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ProMobil 2018 225/70 R15 test, where both the WR C3 and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 91% of Nokian WR C3 has E wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
| # | Nokian WR C3
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Nokian WR C3 Upper-middle
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Nokian WR C3 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 25%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 33%
2. Nokian WR C3 62%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 100%
1. Nokian WR C3 81%
2. Nokian WR C3 50%
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian WR C3 Rating: Conditionally recommended | |||||||
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||