In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Vredestein (59%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Wintrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 2 tests
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Nokian WR A4
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.