• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

# Nokian WR A4
/0%
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
/0%
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
/0%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
/90%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Pirelli
Kumho
GoodYear
DimensionsR16 - R21 R16 - R21 R16 - R19 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

5

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test2+1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
2-22-2
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-2
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Rating: Exemplary
22+1-2
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test30,324,3
Nokian WR A434,625,5
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 335,225,8
Kumho WinterCraft WP7135,728
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+34,424,8
Show test details
Sportscars
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Good
22-2+
Show test details
GTÜ
Name Points totalWinterWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test203696544188
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Recommended
187644544 18 8
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Recommended
190635642177
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Recommended
186595442157
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
6,39,2 7,110
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Rating: Still recommended
7,98,27,86,6
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Rating: Still recommended
7,17,87,86,5
Show test details