• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (91%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR A4 and Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WR A4 and the Pilot Alpin PA4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C rating.

# Nokian WR A4
/0%
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
/0%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Michelin
DimensionsR16 - R21 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-21-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Not recommended
4+2-2
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Good
22 2
Show test details
Sportscars
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+1-
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+22-
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Exemplary
2+21-
Show test details
AutoMotorSport
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Nokian WR A4
Rating: Still recommended
6,39,2 7,110
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Recommended
7,78,18,47,2
Show test details