In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR A4 and Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WR A4 and the Pilot Alpin PA4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 90% of Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has C rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2019 | 255/35 R19 | View |
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Nokian WR A4
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.