Segment
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2020 when was the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the PILOT ALPIN 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (63%) of the Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Premium2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
1. Michelin PILOT ALPIN 5 Exemplary2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | 31,9 | 24,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||