Segment
1. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR A4 and Kumho WinterCraft WP71, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R16 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
4
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory | 3- | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 69 | 65 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Recommended | 187 | 64 | 45 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Recommended | 186 | 59 | 54 | 42 | 15 | 7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Still recommended | 6,3 | 9,2 | 7,1 | 10 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Still recommended | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,8 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
