Segment
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Nokian (61%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian WR A4 and Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the WR A4 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C rating.
| # | Nokian WR A4
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended2. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 1- | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Not recommended | 4+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Still recommended | 6,3 | 9,2 | 7,1 | 10 | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Rating: Still recommended | 6,8 | 8,3 | 8,1 | 7,3 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
