In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the UltraGrip Performance+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ also have B wet ratings.
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Averaged from 2 tests
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Nokian WR A4
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.