Segment
2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium3. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
3. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory4. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended2. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended3. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 33,2 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 69 | 65 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Recommended | 187 | 64 | 45 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Recommended | 191 | 68 | 58 | 39 | 17 | 5 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Recommended | 186 | 59 | 54 | 42 | 15 | 7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Still recommended | 6,3 | 9,2 | 7,1 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Test winner - highly recommended | 9,6 | 9,1 | 8,7 | 8,0 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Still recommended | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,8 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
