Segment
2. Nokian WR A4 Upper-middle3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle4. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian WR A4 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WR A4 9.83
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary3. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory4. Nokian WR A4 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Recommended2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Nokian WR A4 Still recommended4. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1- | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Good | 1- | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 30,3 | 24,3 | |||||
| Nokian WR A4 | 34,6 | 25,5 | |||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P | 31,8 | 25,2 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,3 | 24,5 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | 35,7 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | ||||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | ||||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 69 | 65 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Recommended | 187 | 64 | 45 | 44 | 18 | 8 | |
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Recommended | 191 | 68 | 58 | 39 | 17 | 5 | |
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Recommended | 186 | 59 | 54 | 42 | 15 | 7 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,2 | 9,9 | 10 | |||
| Nokian WR A4 Rating: Still recommended | 6,3 | 9,2 | 7,1 | 10 | |||
| Continental ContiWinterContact TS 850P Rating: Test winner - highly recommended | 9,6 | 9,1 | 8,7 | 8,0 | |||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Recommended | 6,8 | 7,3 | 9,5 | 7,9 | |||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Still recommended | 7,1 | 7,8 | 7,8 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
