Comparison: Nokian WR A4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian WR A4 was done in 2017, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 245/45 R18 test, where both the WR A4 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 94% of Nokian WR A4 has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autobild
|
Winter
|
2020 | 245/45 R18 | View |
Performance comparison
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Nokian WR A4
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
