In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (77%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 has a better rating of 72% compared to 59% of the Nokian WetProof. The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autoklub ČR 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the WetProof and the Ventus Prime 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 also have A wet ratings. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Autoklub ČR
|
Summer
|
2023 | 205/55 R16 | View |
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Nokian WetProof
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.