Segment
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Turanza 6 has a better rating of 77% compared to 68% of the Nokian WetProof. The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Bridgestone Turanza 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (78%) of the Bridgestone Turanza 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WetProof is made in Finland and Turanza 6 is made in Spain.
| # | Nokian WetProof
| Bridgestone Turanza 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza 6 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian WetProof Recommended
