• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 78% compared to 50% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.

# Nokian Wetproof SUV
/50%
Continental PremiumContact 6
/78%

Add to comparison

Nokian
Continental
DimensionsR16 - R19 R15 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Promobil
Name WetDryEnviromental impact
Best values in test7,37,75,9
Nokian WetProof SUV
Rating: Recommended
8,07,97,3
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Recommended
8,98,38,6
Show test details
Autobild
Name WetDryOffroad
Best values in test2+2+2+
Nokian WetProof SUV
Rating: Good
22-2+
Continental PremiumContact 6
Rating: Good
2+ 2+ 2-
Show test details