Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 78% compared to 50% of the Nokian Wetproof SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Wetproof SUV was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Promobil 2022 235/55 R17 test, where both the Wetproof SUV and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Wetproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (82%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
# | Nokian Wetproof SUV
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Wetproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary
2. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 7,3 | 7,7 | 5,9 | ||||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Recommended | 8,0 | 7,9 | 7,3 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 8,9 | 8,3 | 8,6 | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
Nokian WetProof SUV Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2+ | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
Show test details |