Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian WetProof 1 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS91
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Kumho (56%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 98% of Nokian WetProof 1 has A wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Kumho Ecsta PS91 has B rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WetProof 1 is made in Finland and Ecsta PS91 is made in Korea.
| # | Nokian WetProof 1
| Kumho Ecsta PS91
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R18 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS91 Conditionally recommended
