Segment
1. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle2. Kumho Solus HA31 Upper-middle3. Firestone Multiseason Upper-middle4. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle5. Fulda MultiControl Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WeatherProof vs. Kumho Solus HA31 vs. Firestone Multiseason vs. Nokian Seasonproof vs. Fulda MultiControl
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Kumho Solus HA31 8.335. Fulda MultiControl 23.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WeatherProof Good +2. Fulda MultiControl Recommended3. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory4. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory5. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda MultiControl Recommended2. Kumho Solus HA31 Satisfactory3. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory4. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient5. Firestone Multiseason Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,5 | 46,3 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 44,5 | 51,3 | |||||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 43,8 | 49,5 | |||||
| Fulda MultiControl | 45,7 | 57 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 203 | 14 | 37 | 39 | 28 | ||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 203 | 67 | 62 | 42 | 32 | ||
| Kumho Solus HA31 | 160 | 50 | 37 | 42 | 31 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
