Comparison: Nokian WeatherProof vs. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs. Falken EuroALL Season AS210

When considering the all-around tyres, the Nokian WeatherProof and the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 are two models that stand out due to their performance in numerous tests. In this comparison, we will look at the features, strengths, and weaknesses of these two tyres, provided by reputable tyre manufacturers Nokian and Hankook.

The Nokian WeatherProof, produced in Finland, received an overall rating of 59%. It shined particularly in areas such as aquaplaning resistance, snow braking, and snow handling. However, in the Autobild test, it only reached the 9th position out of 27 tested tyres. On the other hand, in the ACE test, it fared a bit better, securing the 4th position out of 8 tyres. Its best aspects being cross and longitudinal aquaplaning, as well as dry handling.

The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750, a Korean made tyre, scored significantly better with an overall rating of 84%. In the Autobild test, it secured a commendable 4th position showcasing the best features in cross aquaplaning, longitudinal aquaplaning, wet handling, and snow handling. This tyre has shown a remarkable upgrade from its previous model, Hankook Kinergy 4S. It positioned 5th in the ACE test, performing best in areas such as cross and longitudinal aquaplaning, dry handling, and snow handling. However, it's worth mentioning that despite its excellent wet condition performance and good snow handling, it fared only moderately in terms of runtime and driving comfort.

In conclusion, both tyres have their unique strengths. The Nokian WeatherProof performs exceptionally under snowy conditions while the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 excels in both wet and dry handling as well as snow handling. Although the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 has a slightly lower lifespan and driving comfort, it has a higher overall rating, making it a preferred choice for many. However, final decisions should always be based on specific personal driving conditions and requirements.