Segment
2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (63%). The first tyre test of Nokian WeatherProof was done in 2015, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 205/55 R16 test, where both the WeatherProof and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Nokian WeatherProof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WeatherProof is made in Finland and Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 is made in Slovenia/France.
| # | Nokian WeatherProof
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WeatherProof Upper-middle
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner2. Nokian WeatherProof Good +
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory2. Nokian WeatherProof Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,7 | 45 | |||||
| Nokian WeatherProof | 45,2 | 51,6 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41,6 | 47 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||