Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (63%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Weatherproof SUV and Vredestein Quatrac 5, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Vredestein Quatrac 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Weatherproof SUV and the Quatrac 5 were tested.
| # | Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Vredestein Quatrac 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Satisfactory
2. Vredestein Quatrac 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,3 | 8,1 | 8,3 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV | 8,3 | 7,4 | 8,1 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Vredestein Quatrac 5 | 6,2 | 7,5 | 6,7 | 8 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||