Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (63%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Weatherproof SUV and Michelin CrossClimate SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin CrossClimate SUV first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 235/60 R18 test, where both the Weatherproof SUV and the CrossClimate SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Michelin CrossClimate SUV has B rating.
| # | Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Premium2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Michelin CrossClimate SUV Exemplary
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate SUV Rating: Good | 2+ | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||