Segment
2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (63%). But when it comes to comparing Nokian Weatherproof SUV and Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Nokian Weatherproof SUV was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Weatherproof SUV and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 67% of Nokian Weatherproof SUV has A wet grip rating, whereas 85% of Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 has B rating.
| # | Nokian Weatherproof SUV
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian Weatherproof SUV Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 Exemplary
2. Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,3 | 8,1 | 8,3 | 10 | 10 | ||
| Nokian Weatherproof SUV | 8,3 | 7,4 | 8,1 | 7 | 8 | ||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 | 8,0 | 6,7 | 8,3 | 10 | 8 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||