Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Snowproof 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ has a better rating of 87% compared to 69% of the Nokian Snowproof 2. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (77%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R0 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
