Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian Snowproof 2 has a better rating of 69% compared to 63% of the Barum Polaris 5. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowproof 2 and the Polaris 5 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Barum Polaris 5 has C rating.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Upper-middle2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good2. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 Recommended2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
| Nokian Snowproof 2 | 40.0 | 30.5 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||