Segment
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Yokohama (46%). The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 79% of Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has C rating.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R13 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
