Segment
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ has a better rating of 90% compared to 61% of the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Very good2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ Recommended2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
