Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 82% compared to 61% of the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV. The first tyre test of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV was done in 2023, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Tyre Reviews 2023 235/60 R18 test, where both the Snowproof 2 SUV and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 95% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Rating: Recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Highly recommended | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||