Segment
1. Nokian Seasonproof Upper-middle2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has a better rating of 64% compared to 58% of the Nokian Seasonproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the Seasonproof and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Seasonproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Seasonproof is made in Russian Federation and HA32 Solus 4S is made in China.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory2. Nokian Seasonproof Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow handling
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 39,9 | 44,4 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof | 46,3 | 52,4 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 44,4 | 51,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Nokian Seasonproof Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 1- | 2- | |||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Good | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Wear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Nokian Seasonproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 1- | 2+ | 2- | 1- | ||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37,6 | 50 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof | 41,4 | 53,5 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41,5 | 54,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Seasonproof Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 1- | ||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
