Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (55%). The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 195/55 R16 test, where both the Seasonproof and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Seasonproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Seasonproof is made in Russian Federation and HA32 Solus 4S is made in China.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Performance comparison
Averaged from 3 tests
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Nokian Seasonproof
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
