Segment
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium2. Nokian Seasonproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof SUV vs. Continental AllSeasonContact
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Nokian (63%). The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof SUV was done in 2022, compared to 2018 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Gute-Fahrt 2022 235/55 R18 test, where both the Seasonproof SUV and the AllSeasonContact were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Seasonproof SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental AllSeasonContact also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof SUV
| Continental AllSeasonContact
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Nokian Seasonproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Seasonproof SUV Satisfactory2. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Seasonproof SUV Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Continental AllSeasonContact Rating: Very good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
