Segment
1. Nokian Seasonproof 2 Upper-middle2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Seasonproof 2 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian allround tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Kumho (55%). In this particular case, the Nokian Seasonproof 2 has a better rating of 90% compared to 49% of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof 2 was done in 2025, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 81% of Nokian Seasonproof 2 has A wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S has B rating.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof 2
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Seasonproof 2 Test winner2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
