Segment
2. Nokian Seasonproof 1 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear allround tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Nokian (63%). In this particular case, the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has a better rating of 79% compared to 36% of the Nokian Seasonproof 1. The first tyre test of Nokian Seasonproof 1 was done in 2024, compared to 2020 when was the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 225/50 R17 test, where both the Seasonproof 1 and the Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Seasonproof 1 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Seasonproof 1
| GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R19 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian Seasonproof 1 Upper-middle
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Test winner
1. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36.8 | 50.5 | |||||
| Nokian Seasonproof 1 | 41.2 | 60.1 | |||||
| Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 | 41.5 | 55.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||