Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Nokian zLine
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Nokian, which is a brand from Finland. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Wet handling
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Dry lane changing
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
