Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2025 when was the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
