Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle2. Firestone Firehawk Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Firestone Firehawk Sport
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (61%). In this particular case, the Firestone Firehawk Sport has a better rating of 76% compared to 52% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Firestone Firehawk Sport first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Firehawk Sport also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Powerproof is made in Finland and Firehawk Sport is made in Italy.
| # | Nokian Powerproof
| Firestone Firehawk Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R18 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Firestone Firehawk Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Firestone Firehawk Sport Satisfactory2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
