Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium4. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle6. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
Let's look at a comparison between two notable summer tyres, the Nokian Powerproof (Nokian is the manufacturer) and the Bridgestone Potenza S001 produced by Bridgestone. Both models have participated in various tests and we will summarize their performances to help you make an informed decision.
The Nokian Powerproof is a summer tyre made in Finland, rating 52% on our scale. This model has now been replaced by the Nokian Powerproof 1, building upon the strengths of its predecessor. In the Autobild test, out of 50 tyres, the Nokian Powerproof ranked second, particularly praised for its wet braking capabilities. However, in a separate ADAC test which focused on noise and interior noise among 16 tyres, it came in at the 11th place.
On the other hand, we have the Bridgestone Potenza S001, a popular summer tyre model. Its standout feature according to the ADAC test is resistance to aquaplaning, landing it the 9th spot among 16 competitors. The Potenza S001 also performed well in the Autobild test, taking the third position overall. The Potenza S001 has not been replaced by a newer model.
Verdict: Compared head to head, the Nokian Powerproof offers excellent wet braking capabilities, making it a viable choice in rainy conditions. However, if noise reduction is a priority for you, it may not be the top scorer. The Bridgestone Potenza S001 cites resistance to aquaplaning as its main strength, making it reliable in wet conditions, too. Rankings in the tests suggest that both tyres perform well overall, with the Powerproof getting a slight edge over the Bridgestone model in terms of performance.
In conclusion, both the Nokian Powerproof and Bridgestone Potenza S001 have unique strengths, but selecting the right one depends upon your specific needs and driving conditions. We recommend checking the newer model, Nokian Powerproof 1 in case it fits your requirements.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
4. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary3. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary4. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary5. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended6. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory4. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended5. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended6. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 3 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
3
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Good | 1- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Good | 1 | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1 | 2 | 3- | ||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 1- | 2- | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 | 33,5 | 28,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 | 33,2 | 30,8 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Sport | 33,2 | 30,9 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti | 33,4 | 31,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
| Nokian Powerproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,4 | 2,4 | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,0 | 1,7 | 3,5 | 2,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
| GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good | 2,3 | 1,7 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2,6 | 2,2 | 3,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | ||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,9 | 2,0 | 2,4 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
