Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof vs. Barum Bravuris 5 HM vs. Pirelli P ZERO vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 K117
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Bravuris 5 HM 26.382. Nokian Powerproof 7.453. Pirelli P ZERO 6.06
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Pirelli P ZERO Good2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended3. Barum Bravuris 5 HM Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 35,7 | 28,9 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 40 | 33,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Nokian Powerproof | 32,9 | 29,1 | |||||
| Barum Bravuris 5 HM | 37,7 | 36,1 | |||||
| Pirelli P ZERO | 34,8 | 34,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
