Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Kumho (58%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (76%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Kumho Ecsta PS71
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
