Segment
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Firestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2024 when was the Firestone Roadhawk 2 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Firestone Roadhawk 2 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Firestone Roadhawk 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Highly recommended2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory2. Firestone Roadhawk 2 Satisfactory
