Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Upper-middle
Comparison: Nokian Powerproof SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (92%) than Nokian (60%). The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof SUV was done in 2020, compared to 2017 when was the Continental PremiumContact 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof SUV dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Continental PremiumContact 6 also have A wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Powerproof SUV
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof SUV Satisfactory
